|
Post by David G. on Mar 16, 2016 12:14:41 GMT -6
If one is kicked from the region, they're proven to be inactive, and may not care as much as they should. Therefore, if one is ejected, or should have been ejected, they should be required to re-apply for citizenship in order to prove their activity. Leave your thoughts below.
|
|
|
Post by Faran on Mar 16, 2016 12:45:53 GMT -6
I endorse
|
|
|
Post by Faran on Mar 16, 2016 12:46:26 GMT -6
Because this happened with Karim and he is going inactive again and I might have to kick him
|
|
|
Post by Le Libertia on Mar 17, 2016 23:22:10 GMT -6
If one is kicked from the region, they're proven to be inactive, and may not care as much as they should. Therefore, if one is ejected, or should have been ejected, they should be required to re-apply for citizenship in order to prove their activity. Leave your thoughts below. I don't believe that answering questions about our constitution, or taking any type of test will be beneficial. Our citizenship test has virtually nothing to do about activity, nor do I think that taking it will “prove their activity.” It will be an inconvenient waste of time. And also by putting this to law, any member of the government who is inactive for 3 days will lose their citizenship, and as a result, lose their government position. This would be really unfair. I feel that this proposal's purpose is to deal with Karim. And the best way to deal with him is to put him on trial, not passing this specific legislation. Just taking a citizenship quiz will not be a good solution to the Karim's situation.
|
|
|
Post by David G. on Mar 18, 2016 10:46:30 GMT -6
Proposition pulled by me.
|
|