|
Post by Le Libertia on Jan 9, 2016 14:03:24 GMT -6
It is acknowledged that The Somewhat Democratic Republic of Doom has passed a bill, Revision #2: New Voting System, shortening the process for amendments and bills to pass. However, the bill takes away some rights of Congress members. The bill limits the number of proposals that can be made by Congress members in an amount of time. In this bill, it says: “ Congressmen must also wait for a certain amount of time after posting one poll before they can post another. They must wait the amount of people in congress (including themselves) days before posting another poll.”This proposal disagrees with this writing. Congressmen should not have a limit of days it takes to propose another bill. The very purpose of the Congress is to pass legislation, and this section of the bill only slows down the passage of legislation. Therefore, if this amendment is passed, the above text of Doom's “Revision #2: New Voting System” will no longer affect the Congress. Congress members will be able to pass laws with no time limit restricting the next time they can introduce another bill.This amendment will enable the region to pass laws much quicker without restrictions.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ATTENTION: To make it clear, this poll will lock a day from now, on Sunday (1-10-15), at 2:00 p.m. This time limit is enforced by Constitutional Law.
|
|
|
Post by Le Libertia on Jan 9, 2016 14:05:42 GMT -6
I believe that this amendment will be especially helpful to Congress, and passing legislation.
|
|
|
Post by David G. on Jan 9, 2016 15:55:09 GMT -6
As a congress member, I do not support this. Too many things can happen too quickly, and a limit is needed so that people can keep up.
|
|
|
Post by Medecion on Jan 9, 2016 20:41:43 GMT -6
As a member of the federalist party, I believe that large government is important. Limiting laws slows down government, and only makes it more bureaucratic. If we limit the amount of laws that can be proposed, our productivity will be lowered, as well as our efficiency. This law limit is not logical at all, and also not needed.
|
|
|
Post by David G. on Jan 9, 2016 21:54:06 GMT -6
As a member of the federalist party, I believe that large government is important. Limiting laws slows down government, and only makes it more bureaucratic. If we limit the amount of laws that can be proposed, our productivity will be lowered, as well as our efficiency. This law limit is not logical at all, and also not needed. Although we are in the same party, I disagree. This law prevents the hyper-expansion of our government, which may be beneficiary. As much as I like a large government, it should be more gradual, and more organized. Quality over quantity.
|
|
|
Post by Medecion on Jan 10, 2016 15:12:04 GMT -6
As a member of the federalist party, I believe that large government is important. Limiting laws slows down government, and only makes it more bureaucratic. If we limit the amount of laws that can be proposed, our productivity will be lowered, as well as our efficiency. This law limit is not logical at all, and also not needed. Although we are in the same party, I disagree. This law prevents the hyper-expansion of our government, which may be beneficiary. As much as I like a large government, it should be more gradual, and more organized. Quality over quantity. What would be the important part of preventing hyper-expansion of government? The larger our government, the greater our region. How we get to this doesn't matter, as long as it is done in a morally correct way. If there is a law with low quality, it probably will not be passed in the first place, teaching people to put more effort into creating laws.
|
|
|
Post by Le Libertia on Jan 10, 2016 17:11:41 GMT -6
Well now, this law is officially passed. Narrowly passed, 3-2, but it still did. David, please insert this amendment into the Book of Law. Everyone, thank you for voting.
|
|